Case Study †Profitel Inc Essay

Decision maker Lars Peeters, along with his team of executivesQuestion 1 Which perspective of leading best explains the problems experienced in this case? Analyze the case using concepts discussed in that leadership perspective. Leadership is defined as the collective effectiveness and successes of organizations members by influencing, motivating, and enabling others to contribute. In this case Lars Peeters, newly appointed CEO of Profitel, fails to maintain his role by lacking key ingredients central for effective leadership. Together with his executive team he claimd from his previous employment, weaken Profitels image and success with customers, government leaders and even employees.Listed below are perspectives of leadership I have identified in this case that best explain the problems at hand Contingency purview Lars had not diagnosed Profitelss situation thoroughly and suitable their style and objectives to fit that situation. Instead of using the employees thoughts and ins ights as a powerful recourses, Lars went ahead with his team of executives and implemented his strategies disregarding any feedback.Behavioral status Although Lars displays task-oriented behavior by pushing company to reach a certain goal, he lacks in people-oriented behavioral skills. This could explain for his disregard to his subordinates trust and lack of employee morale. Transformational Perspective Lars failed to create a strategic vision for Profitel. By using one he could have build employee morale by increasing commitment and honor based on performances.Questions 2 What can organizations do to minimize the leadership problems discussed above? In this case Profitels broad based there to hire Lars as CEO based on reputation rather than focusing on how his expertise could benefit their company. Lars took incentive in implementing all major decisions without others enter or involvement. The board of directors seemed to have minimal role in the companys development and should have taken more precautions like overseeing major decisions. withal they should have evaluated his internal performance through feedback from employees and external performance through customers.